I left the headline like the original, but I see this as a massive win for Apple. The device is ridiculously expensive, isn’t even on sale yet and already has 150 apps specifically designed for that.

If Google did this, it wouldn’t even get 150 dedicated apps even years after launch (and the guaranteed demise of it) and even if it was something super cheap like being made of fucking cardboard.

This is something that as an Android user I envy a lot from the Apple ecosystem.

Apple: this is a new feature => devs implement them in their apps the very next day even if it launches officially in 6 months.

Google: this is a new feature => devs ignore it, apps start to support it after 5-6 Android versions

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      150 apps that has been explicitly updated to support a device that’s so expensive that’s guaranteed that nobody would actually buy it is a lot. And it’s not even on sale yet!

      For comparison look at the Microsoft hololens. Similar concept and similar price, announced 8 years ago, can only dream of having 150 useful apps. If i go on the hololens store page it says “Showing 1 - 90 of 321 items” and you can see that are mostly demos or proof of concepts.

      8 years after the launch has just over double the apps for a device that will launch next month

    • HalJor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Most of those millions of apps are crap that hasn’t been updated in years, and they don’t have millions of users (not the kind of users who would by a Vision Pro at launch, anyway). I haven’t read the list but I’m betting the 150 that are here are much more popular and useful for this platform – the kinds of apps that would actively benefit from this technology and that the users actually want and will use.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          because when I use Safari, Notes and Word what I REALLY need is augmenter reality

          You may not realize it, but you actually want AR for everything: pick up some coffee, read some news, take some notes, write them into a document… while still sipping your coffee, and no computers in sight.

          AR is not the tiny dancing characters you see through your phone’s camera, that’s a silly gimmick. AR is the equivalent of picking a bunch of sheets of paper, and having them display the different apps, except without any paper, or taking any physical space, or buying more devices to fill your workspace.

            • jarfil@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              As strange as looking at your monitor, instead of buying a newspaper that you can take to the bathroom then reuse it when you’re done.

              Having monitors, screens, and other displays scattered around, will be as backwards as the newspaper thing. Why even buy a monitor, when you have all the virtual monitors you might ever want, right there on your head?

                • jarfil@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  We’re talking about specific device

                  I was talking about AR, not a specific device.

                  Jesus, Mac fanboys are just the worst…

                  Right… thanks, but no thanks.

    • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah it’s like the early days of the iPad, when devs could make their iPhone apps available for the iPad as a scaled up version. They weren’t iPad apps, but they were on the store marked as such (and were wildly unusable like that), so the numbers were incredibly misleading.