Kamala Harris has the support of enough Democratic delegates to win the party’s nomination for president, according to CNN’s delegate estimate.

While endorsements from delegates continue to come in, the vice president has now been backed by well more than the 1,976 pledged delegates she’ll need to win the nomination on the first ballot.

Harris crossed the threshold amid a wave of endorsements from state delegations Monday evening.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck off

    I love what Harris has been doing with messaging so far but this predetermination of delegates bullshit just harkens back to Clinton.

    Leave the determination until the fucking convention.

    • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Everyone can see that you’ll just wait until the convention to make up more shit to get upset about.

      You will whine about “predetermination” now but it will be something else if Kamala secures a nomination. You will never accept this nor anything else that is positive for democrats. You will find a reason to whine, your reasons are just excuses.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s a nice strawman you’ve got there. If you check my comments you’d see that’s very much not the case but your blind faith in how you judge others must be very comforting and reassuring.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Exactly! The party running on saving democracy already stole our ability to democratically select a candidate. At least they should be willing to present the appearance of an approximation of democracy. Somehow that’s suddenly a radical position.

      • Brokkr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It would be great if we had a system like that, but we never have and it is not part of the constitution. Political parties have always been allowed to choose any candidate by any means that they want to put on their ticket. They could even choose 2 people, but that would be a bad idea. This will continue to be true as long as we have first past the post elections (and the electoral college). Ranked choice voting would solve some of these problems.

        The democratic election happens when we vote for the president. The primaries are basically large state by state polls. No one’s ability to vote was stolen and everyone who votes is still allowed to write in a name if they choose (but that is akin to not voting given our current system).

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The democratic election happens when we vote for the president.

          Quit abusing the word “democracy” like that. A country picking one of two choices handed to them by oligarchs is not democracy.

          Activists labored for decades and died in police crackdowns to achieve the concession of primary elections from the two parties. You are pissing on their sacrifices. We don’t give up hard won rights just because they aren’t explicitly mandated by the constitution.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Agreed, but that’s not really relevant as to whether or not we should wait for the convention for the delegates to choose. The primary election is done.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                They are waiting for the convention to choose, these choices are not made yet. They do, however, still have first amendment protections, so if they want to tell CNN who they plan to vote for, then they may. CNN, enjoying freedom of the press, has the right to ask.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s wagging the dog. The delegates declare support now, the media runs with that and treats Harris as the obvious winner while ignoring other candidates. By the time the convention happens the public has already accepted Harris as the winner, making it inevitable.