• Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Prpbably the chain of reasoning OP follows:

        Watch Movie -> Studio gets Money -> Tom Cruise gets Money -> Tom Cruise donates Scientology Money

        I understand why they wouldn’t spend money on it, not watching it entirely is then just a more extreme form of this where you also don’t contribute to public interest in the movie

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t even find him to be a good actor, too generic and cookie cutter. Not my cup of tea. I watch movie es to see different characters, not him doing the same thing. He WAS good, but all his more recent stuff is just the same role with a different name.

    • Gazumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whilst all religions have bad actors, Scientology is a masterclass of bad actors. A bad Christian, Jew, Bhuddist etc., is clearly an outlier and doesn’t represent a faithfull. Scientolgoy charges fee’s to be a ranked member and has BS tech devices. As a whole, Scientology has bad eggs baked in across the board

      • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it really bother you that I think he’s a terrible actor and used religion as another reasoning…

        My boycott list is huge though…yeah. Walmart’s even on it