Leaks confirm low takeup for Windows 11::Time to rethink Windows 10 support cycle then?

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    No shit…people don’t want more ads and normal features hidden behind 12 new windows/tabs…

    Stop fucking with the os and maybe people will want to continue with it .

  • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Windows 10 replaced 7 for most people because 8 was a piece of junk. Windows 7 was old by the time 10 came out so there was pent up demand and 10 was a pretty solid showing.

    There’s not much that’s compelling about 11 and they’ve introduced unwanted things. It shouldn’t be surprising that people prefer to stay on 10, which is one of the better operating systems Microsoft has ever released. Combine that with the dominance of Linux in the server space and what seems like increased adoption on the desktop and it’s a recipe for poor numbers. For a lot of developers, it’s easier being on a Linux desktop when Linux is the deployment target.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Is there even any actual positive for upgrading? I haven’t heard a single good thing about Windows 11 vs 10

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I saw in my old line of work that most business over a certain size just have a few key programs that need to work and could not give two shits about whatever new OS was out if it could not run those programs. The fact that in places like the banking sector many of the programs are UNIX era and need emulation just to use on a desktop and not being spied is often a requirement it would make no sense what so ever to upgrade. I have also seen an uptick in Linux and Mac workstations as both are looking more attractive then the wild ride windows has become.

      Oh and in case people think security on older OS is a concern for companies I know for a fact that several ATMs in north America are still running on XP (upgraded about 7 years ago from 2000).

      • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        My last gig was as a CIO in a fairly large organization and we had stringent infosec requirements due to the industry we were in. Old operating systems and software are absolutely an issue, although it still doesn’t stop some companies from running them.

        Most of the malware going around exploits patched vulnerabilities. It literally takes seconds and not exactly a high skill level to compromise a machine that’s missing security updates. Regular patching is without a doubt one of the best controls you can have in place. The other big issue was social engineering. If you don’t effectively tackle those two things it doesn’t matter what else you do because you will be breached.

        Besides that, you’re mostly right. We were all over the security updates but didn’t care for other upgrades because they introduce instability. It’s the last thing you want with thousands of endpoints and a bunch of shitty enterprise apps. Run it until the wheels fall off or it’s approaching EOL for security updates.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh sorry if it came across as old software not being a security issue just that most places don’t care or plan around it (those ATMs running XP are running a very stripped and locked down version).

          I remember quite a few places paying extra for a little bit longer for updates just due to how rough the change was going to be. I think most of the time when something did go wrong at a place it was (in this order):

          • Social engineering
          • Some sort of update that was not tested enough (or at all)
          • A new roll out going bad (this happened way more then it should have)
          • Hardware failure (often because a sales guy did not know the difference between “redundancy” and “reduced failure rate”
          • Actual disaster (I remember getting calls about a bank networking device calling home with fan errors as the building it was in was floating down the river)
  • nottheengineer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There is nothing about windows 11 that’s better than on windows 10. Why would anyone switch voluntarily?

    Windows 10 at least had better automatic driver installation, touchscreen and multi-monitor support compared to 7, but came with a shitload of ads built right into it. Windows 11 has even more ads, but what does it give you?