You must log in or register to comment.
Progress, indeed.
- her chair is more comfortable
- her clothing is less restrictive, owing to reduced standards of obedience to authority imposed on women
- what she’s reading is her own choice
- notice how the bible woman has to sit? That’s because she’s shorter. Improved nutritional standards mean the 1915 woman is better-fed, and as a result, is taller
According to a quick, entirely un-fact-checked google, women in 1600s england had a 10% literacy rate. At least the bible would’ve been in english at this point?
That’s how I realized I was getting old, when I saw my peers saying the same things about the kids today that our elders said about us.
Oh nice, just like Mike Johnson, who gave a talk extolling how 18th century values are necessary or everything goes to shit.
Ah yes, the classic 18th century virtue of revolting against the ruling theocratic monarchy, which was only conceived because the Pope wouldn’t let Henry VIII divorce his first of six wives.
The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.
They [Young People] have exalted notions, because they have not been humbled by life or learned its necessary limitations; moreover, their hopeful disposition makes them think themselves equal to great things – and that means having exalted notions. They would always rather do noble deeds than useful ones: Their lives are regulated more by moral feeling than by reasoning – all their mistakes are in the direction of doing things excessively and vehemently. They overdo everything – they love too much, hate too much, and the same with everything else.
— Aristotle (~340 BC)
POV: bad parenting, “gobble up dainties” who put them there to begin with?
…cross their legs…
Is that a metaphor?
No. At the time, sitting attentively with your feet together was good manners. Crossing your legs would have been considered lax or sloven.
