• Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Crazy that this works. There are some really smart people in this world.

    Also cool to see a company invest money into something like this simply for the impact to the customer experience.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Apple Store experience was so different from what shopping for a computer used to be like. Knowledgeable, friendly staff, computers you can actually use instead of just playing screen savers, and training, repairs, and support at the same place. Not at all like going to a Best Buy or Circuit City.

  • allywilson@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think this is very clever, a great idea. I also think someone is going to figure out how to turn on iphones via NFC and upload malware of some kind.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Apple are much much smarter than me, so I’m sure have mitigated against this, but this feels like a securirty nightmare waiting to happen:

    Bad guy gets hold of the technology, works out an exploit to send unofficial update and then “patches” a containership full of iPhones.

        • B0rax@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s basically the same as updating the iPhone over usb. There has not been a chance to have the iPhone run a modified iOS update in over 10 years now iirc.

          It is not like people have not tried.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why would they attempt to go through unsold iPhones? They can simply force Apple to push updates to all existing iPhones.

          • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            If I’m (say) the UK intelligence service and I want to spy on (rolls dice) a group of people in Switzerland- it much easier for me to intercept their packages and patch them in transit then having to talk to Apple.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I disagree. If the packages aren’t routed through UK, you’d have to work with other countries secret service, distribution companies, and you have much more legal troubles to consider.

              • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Because clearly a secret service of one country could never infiltrate FedEx’s distribution depot in another.

                • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Because the secret service of one country acting in another country where they don’t have jurisdiction is an international political crisis that could lead to war. Don’t play dumb.

                  One means a country forcing a company acting inside that country to do something. The other means one country having to ask another country to be allowed to force a company acting inside the other country to do something. See where one is much easier?