gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agoSupreme Court Rules Against Women Whose Cars Were Seized by the Policewww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1214file-text
arrow-up1214external-linkSupreme Court Rules Against Women Whose Cars Were Seized by the Policewww.nytimes.comgAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBuelldozer@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up41·edit-25 months agoThe women got their cars back, this case wasn’t about that, but SCOTUS really needs to deal with the “Civil Asset Forfeiture” monster that they created.
minus-squareFenrirIII@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 months agoWhy? The cops protect the rich, like judges. They want to keep them happy so they can use their privilege to avoid consequences
The women got their cars back, this case wasn’t about that, but SCOTUS really needs to deal with the “Civil Asset Forfeiture” monster that they created.
Why? The cops protect the rich, like judges. They want to keep them happy so they can use their privilege to avoid consequences