Stockholders will receive $44.00 per share in cash, which represents a premium of 29% over the 90-day volume weighted average trading price of $34.09 Squarespace, Inc. (NYSE: SQSP ), the design-driven platform helping entrepreneurs build brands and businesses online, today announced that it has entered into a definitive agreement to go private by Permira, the global private equity firm, in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $6.9 billion. Under the terms of the agreement, Squarespace stockholders will receive $44.00 per share in cash representing a transaction valued at over $6.6 billion on an equity value basis and approximately $6.9 billion on an enterprise value basis. The purchase price represents a premium of approximately 29% over Squarespace’s 90-day volume weighted average trading price, and a premium of 15% over Squarespace’s closing share price of $38.19 on the NYSE on May 10, 2024. Upon completion of the transaction, Squarespace will become a privately held

  • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    6 months ago

    I dont know how to feel about this…

    My domain got transfered to them from Google domains shutting down and now its being brought under a private equity umbrella… Something fucky.

  • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    What’s the benefit of going private for a company that’s owned by private equity? Like from a regular standpoint, not being subjected to the constant growth demands of shareholders is good, but I wouldn’t think private equity cares about that as long as they’re making money

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      6 months ago

      not being subjected to the constant growth demands of shareholders is good

      ohhhhhhhhhhhhh man

      You don’t even want to know about the growth demands in the PE space. You’ll be begging for shareholder growth-curve demands in about zero seconds.

    • wrekone@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 months ago

      There will likely be no benefit for the employees or the users. For the PE firm, the goal is usually to pump up the value and resell or reenter the market, at a massive profit, in a few years. To do that, they’ll have to make a lot of unpopular choices, such as layoffs and other cost cutting measures. If they’re privately held, those choices have far less impact on the value of the company, since the stock market is heavily swayed by public perception.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 months ago

        Probably going to be what happened to Toys R Us where the company currently has value but private equity will pull out cash and anything not bolted down and load up what remains with extreme amounts of debt before abandoning what remains. The skeleton of a company that remains will be viewed as unviable as it will have large amounts of debt and no cash once the vultures have stripped everything off.

      • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or if they can’t do that, they’ll load it up with the debt of its failed businesses and then let it loose to fail.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sometimes appeasing shareholders isn’t good for business.

      This would mean it is more likely that employees will see greater benefits. Certainly doesn’t guarantee that, but without shareholders to appease, the workers have more leverage.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Shareholders were bought out for $44.00 per share.

          You’re thinking about “investors” which are not the same as “shareholders”.

          There are no more shareholders. There are no more shades to hold.

          • athairmor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            6 months ago

            What? Private companies can and do sell shares of the company and people who own them are shareholders. The difference is that the shares aren’t traded on public markets.

            People who own shares in publicly traded companies are also called investors.

  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is just the public warning to stop using square space. Once the PE vultures are in, the product will be made worse and more expensive until it shuts down for lack of “profitability”and growth.

  • cmrn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I want no part to do with them after they got all the Google domains—they’re not a company I would have willingly supported before, so I’m not about to now that I’ve been forced into it.