…blasted those who held up Hezbollah and Hamas flags, both considered terrorist organizations by the United States, as well as protesters who carried a banner saying, “Long live October 7th.”

…one protester said he wished Adolf Hitler “was still here” because “he would’ve wiped all you out.”

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    So I’m accusing someone of saying something they never said, but it’s apparently okay when you do it.

    I mean you substantiated your position several times, unless I was supposed to interpret “More than one. This sounds more like you didn’t read the article.” as anything other than a tacit agreement with the articles sentiment.

    If so, feel free to explain.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ll explain when you acknowledge you implied I said something I did not say, something you accused me of doing.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lol, the explanation kinda has a lot to do with determining what you actually meant with your rebuttal.

        I took it as defending the premise of the article itself, which was attempting to paint the entire protest as antisemitic in nature.

        How else am I supposed to “more than one” other than supporting the article?

        I didn’t accuse you of conflating antisemitism and pro Palestine until that particular rebuttal.