• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    And those countries are wrong. Using a comma as a decimal point makes no logical sense, especially in computing. And it’s ugly from an aesthetics standpoint.

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      …no?

      I think what plays into this is also language. In English / to you, I presume it makes perfect sense to say “Pi is approximately three point one four”. In other languages (for me, German) the literal translation “Pi ist ungefähr drei Punkt eins vier” sounds awful and wrong. We say “Pi ist ungefähr drei Komma eins vier” (“Pi is approximately three comma one four”) so we also write it like this 🤷🏼‍♀️

      • Kayn@dormi.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Not language directly, but rather force of habit.

        It sounds wrong to you because you grew up saying it another way.

        There is no one way that objectively makes more sense than the other, each language simply has its own habits. If everyone in Germany said “drei Punkt eins vier”, it wouldn’t sound awful to you at all.

        • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Sure, but if everyone said it differently, than that would also be part of the language. I don’t disagree with you, I just think you’ve described language (in this context) 😄

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s only ugly because you aren’t used to it.

      Also, both systems make equally as much - or little - sense. Math notations is just using whichever symbol is commonly available and easy to write without asking whether it makes logical sense.

      Are you complaining that the factorial operator makes no logical sense either? Or the “#” symbol for the cardinality of a set?