It’s hard to feel disappointed about something you don’t really care about. That is to say, the reason I feel disappointed is because I like this community and I want it to be a place for civil discourse. Conversely, I’ve given up on Reddit, so nothing that happens there can really disappoint me any more, I no longer care about it.
I’m not going to make a fuss about something that doesn’t impact me, but I will make a fuss about something I believe in, like Lemmy.
Exactly. Having sources is the minimal starting point to make an opinion. That’s not because this community is supposed safe that I could trust any user information
The article is just a collection of hyperlinks. Useless article and I will not look through all of them, and I couldn’t even know they were talking about something from the article anyway
So you were downvoted for not bothering to read or even skim the article to do a minimum amount of looking on your own to see what they were talking about.
What do you mean ? (sources)
Google “Elon Musk Nazi”, and/or “Elon Musk genocide”
Google “any name Nazi” and you’ll get results. The question was what are you referring to.
Also, I can’t believe this community would down vote anyone for asking for sources, that’s disgusting. I’m disappointed Lemmy.
If you’re so disgusted and disappointed, why don’t you try to find a different community?
It’s hard to feel disappointed about something you don’t really care about. That is to say, the reason I feel disappointed is because I like this community and I want it to be a place for civil discourse. Conversely, I’ve given up on Reddit, so nothing that happens there can really disappoint me any more, I no longer care about it.
I’m not going to make a fuss about something that doesn’t impact me, but I will make a fuss about something I believe in, like Lemmy.
Exactly. Having sources is the minimal starting point to make an opinion. That’s not because this community is supposed safe that I could trust any user information
They asked for a source in the comments about an article that has sources. RTFA.
The article is just a collection of hyperlinks. Useless article and I will not look through all of them, and I couldn’t even know they were talking about something from the article anyway
So you were downvoted for not bothering to read or even skim the article to do a minimum amount of looking on your own to see what they were talking about.
Don’t pretend like the downvoters read anything
Don’t pretend like that’s an argument for you to not bother to read anything and ask others to spoon feed you information.
Stop being so toxic. Usually bold claims like that have nothing to do with the article
Yes very sourcy
I’m not the one who made the claim, just giving the most basic of research advice
There are links in the actual article being discussed here.