• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah I’m not arguing with that. You’re just nitpicking semantics because you have lost this argument. Literally the very next sentence after the one you quoted I qualified that by saying it’s debatable.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        What?

        So you’re arguing that “anything is possible” and that means you “won” if someone can’t prove something isn’t real?

        You can’t prove I’m not 6 year old baby Jesus on a time traveling Blackberry…

        But anyone that believes that doesn’t have a rationally sound mind.

        • bastion@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t have a horse in this race, but man, let it drop. The person who’s fighting for ridiculous improbabilities here is you. Nobody you’re arguing with in this thread is even making a claim that Magic Jesus existed. Just that the man named Jesus who is talked about by the early Christians likely existed (which is scholarly consensus, not even a niche claim). They’re specifically not claiming that the fantastical claims made by the early Christians about that man are true.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I don’t have a horse in this race, but man, let it drop

            You replied to a day old comment telling me to drop it…

            • bastion@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              shrug it’s a post currently showing up in “all”.

              Go ahead and get another last word in if you like - you’re arguing with your own ghosts, mostly. Have a good night.