The US Supreme Court has ruled in a 6-3 vote along ideological lines that cities can ban homeless people from sleeping rough.It is the court’s most significant decision on homelessness since at least the 1980s, when many experts say the modern US homeless crisis began.The ruling says that local governments can enforce laws against people sleeping in public places without being in violation of the US constitution’s limits on cruel and unusual punishment.The case started in the small city of Grants Pass, Oregon, where three homeless people sued after receiving citations for sleeping and camping outside.At a Supreme Court hearing in April, the city argued that criminal penalties were necessary to enforce local laws banning homeless people from public spaces for “reasons of cleanliness and safety”.The homeless residents said those penalties violated the Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution because the city did not have any public shelters.Writing for the conservative majority in an opinion issued on Friday, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that the city’s regulations on camping do not inflict “terror, pain or disgrace”.He added that the law does not criminalise the “mere status” of being homeless, and that the ban focuses more on the actions taken by individuals rather than their status alone.“Under the city’s laws, it makes no difference whether the charged defendant is homeless, a backpacker on vacation passing through town, or a student who abandons his dorm room to camp out in protest on the lawn of a municipal building,” Justice Gorsuch wrote.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing on behalf of the three dissenting liberal justices, wrote: “Sleep is a biological necessity, not a crime.
Around 653,000 people did not have homes in 2023, the largest number since tracking began in 2007, according to US government figures.
There were also an estimated 256,000 people living without shelter on a given night across the country last year, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.Reacting to the ruling, the National Alliance to End Homelessness said it “sets a dangerous precedent that will cause undue harm to people experiencing homelessness and give free reign to local officials who prefer pointless and expensive arrests and imprisonment, rather than real solutions”.Grants Pass’s population has doubled to 40,000 in the last 20 years, but its supply of affordable or public housing has not.Soaring housing costs led to a sizeable number of people losing their homes.Town officials responded by passing laws that fined people for sleeping or camping in public.
Over time, those fines stacked up, reaching thousands of dollars for some.Unable to pay for multiple citations, three homeless people sued the city.Their lawsuit reached the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which decided in 2022 that the restrictions in Grants Pass were so tight that they amounted to an effective ban on being homeless within city limits.The court had determined four years earlier in a similar case in Idaho that the constitution “bars a city from prosecuting people criminally for sleeping outside on public property when those people have no home or other shelter to go to".
“The Supreme Court’s Grants Pass decision will now allow cities to take more severe measures without the fear of legal recourse.The first problem with putting homeless people in jail is that it is extremely expensive, and when they get out, the person is still homeless and now even less apt to finding employment with a criminal record, says Elizabeth Funk, founder of DignityMoves, a nonprofit dedicated to ending unsheltered homelessness.“We need to be thinking about how to get this problem solved,” she says.
The issue has been at the heart of recent election cycles in West Coast cities, including Los Angeles, where officials have poured record amounts of money into creating shelters and affordable housing while homelessness has still increased.
The original article contains 830 words, the summary contains 625 words. Saved 25%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The US Supreme Court has ruled in a 6-3 vote along ideological lines that cities can ban homeless people from sleeping rough.It is the court’s most significant decision on homelessness since at least the 1980s, when many experts say the modern US homeless crisis began.The ruling says that local governments can enforce laws against people sleeping in public places without being in violation of the US constitution’s limits on cruel and unusual punishment.The case started in the small city of Grants Pass, Oregon, where three homeless people sued after receiving citations for sleeping and camping outside.At a Supreme Court hearing in April, the city argued that criminal penalties were necessary to enforce local laws banning homeless people from public spaces for “reasons of cleanliness and safety”.The homeless residents said those penalties violated the Eighth Amendment of the US Constitution because the city did not have any public shelters.Writing for the conservative majority in an opinion issued on Friday, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that the city’s regulations on camping do not inflict “terror, pain or disgrace”.He added that the law does not criminalise the “mere status” of being homeless, and that the ban focuses more on the actions taken by individuals rather than their status alone.“Under the city’s laws, it makes no difference whether the charged defendant is homeless, a backpacker on vacation passing through town, or a student who abandons his dorm room to camp out in protest on the lawn of a municipal building,” Justice Gorsuch wrote.Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing on behalf of the three dissenting liberal justices, wrote: “Sleep is a biological necessity, not a crime.
Around 653,000 people did not have homes in 2023, the largest number since tracking began in 2007, according to US government figures.
There were also an estimated 256,000 people living without shelter on a given night across the country last year, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development.Reacting to the ruling, the National Alliance to End Homelessness said it “sets a dangerous precedent that will cause undue harm to people experiencing homelessness and give free reign to local officials who prefer pointless and expensive arrests and imprisonment, rather than real solutions”.Grants Pass’s population has doubled to 40,000 in the last 20 years, but its supply of affordable or public housing has not.Soaring housing costs led to a sizeable number of people losing their homes.Town officials responded by passing laws that fined people for sleeping or camping in public.
Over time, those fines stacked up, reaching thousands of dollars for some.Unable to pay for multiple citations, three homeless people sued the city.Their lawsuit reached the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which decided in 2022 that the restrictions in Grants Pass were so tight that they amounted to an effective ban on being homeless within city limits.The court had determined four years earlier in a similar case in Idaho that the constitution “bars a city from prosecuting people criminally for sleeping outside on public property when those people have no home or other shelter to go to".
“The Supreme Court’s Grants Pass decision will now allow cities to take more severe measures without the fear of legal recourse.The first problem with putting homeless people in jail is that it is extremely expensive, and when they get out, the person is still homeless and now even less apt to finding employment with a criminal record, says Elizabeth Funk, founder of DignityMoves, a nonprofit dedicated to ending unsheltered homelessness.“We need to be thinking about how to get this problem solved,” she says.
The issue has been at the heart of recent election cycles in West Coast cities, including Los Angeles, where officials have poured record amounts of money into creating shelters and affordable housing while homelessness has still increased.
The original article contains 830 words, the summary contains 625 words. Saved 25%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!