• Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Did you know that you can move things between drives? No one plays their entire Steam library at the same time, but I can store much of it ready to play on large-capacity HDDs, which are dirt-cheap. If I suddenly got back into Skyrim again, I’d spend a few minutes moving it to one of my SSDs.

    • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly…spinning disks are good for anything. Yeah I don’t have any in my gaming rig but my NAS is only spinners. Cheap and fast enough.

      It all comes down to how much money you have. If you can only afford spinning disks, then get them - and enjoy your gaming. If you can afford faster drives then great, good for you!

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I used to think this too until I got a proper NVME (instead of another SATA SSD). Once you get used to programs opening instantly—and no loading screens in games, ever—there’s no going back to spinning disks. Waiting 10-20 seconds for a program to open on a HDD feels like an eternity now.

        Edit: formatting, spelling

        • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah but you must recognise that’s a luxury. There’s no going back because your circumstances allow it. If someone needs more storage but they can’t afford an SSD then there is going back - and I for one would choose loading screens over no screens.

          There’s way too much snobbery around PCs imo. I want to encourage the world to be more compromising so that there is no societal pressure to buy this year’s gfx card for £1700 and this year’s CPU for £700 and this year’s newest nvme for £300 etc…etc…buy what you can and want to afford.

  • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Theres only one type of mod that racked up 100gb of Skyrim mods. And it’s not because of looting mods!

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah. Textures and remodels.

      100 GBs is mid-tier modding nowadays. That’s where you stop if you want Skyrim to still be Skyrim instead of a game made in the last 5 years that is actually good.

  • Xero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Who the hell only have 100GB of modded Skyrim? Even just my install of FO4 is at least 400GB.

      • Xero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        What do want him to do? Redownload 100GB worth of mods at some point in the future in which he wants to play the game again?

        I don’t know about you but I’m keeping my 400GB modded FO4, even if I haven’t touched the game in more than half a year. I rather spend 4 hours updating mods than spend 8 hours redownloading everything and spend another 8 hours debugging the crashes.