• Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nobody said that. You can’t just make shit up and act like it’s what the person you’re arguing with is thinking.

    Also people talk about this shit like we bombed today’s Japan. Japan was a horrendous empire. They were doing the same shit the Nazis were doing but in asia. Do you condem the Dresden Fire bombing this fervently? Or do you just defend the stuff that’s buzz worthy?

    Not nuking Japan would have allowed the USSR to invade Japan before they surrendered. Meaning another East/West Berlin/German situation. Can you honestly say that would have had a lower death toll?

    Stop hopping on this contextless internet hills for dying on and learn your history.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Like I said…

      And yes, I do condemn the Dresden Fire Bombing. Sure the Nazis were bad but wiping out thousands of innocent civilian lives like that was a war crime, nothing else.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          A war crime is a violation of the laws of war that gives rise to individual criminal responsibility for actions by combatants in action, such as intentionally killing civilians or intentionally killing prisoners of war, torture, taking hostages, unnecessarily destroying civilian property, deception by perfidy, wartime sexual violence, pillaging, and for any individual that is part of the command structure who orders any attempt to committing mass killings including genocide or ethnic cleansing, the granting of no quarter despite surrender, the conscription of children in the military and flouting the legal distinctions of proportionality and military necessity.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crime

          It’s literally the first part of the definition.