• Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    more precisely, every base has 10, but it’s usually not equal to ten. ten is a fixed value, while 10 depends on the base. you still count normally (one two three four five), even in a base two system. you just write it differently.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t see the need to bring values into this, this is about the naming of number systems. We really have no more claim to ten being this many (…) than hexadecimal people have to claim ten has this many (…)

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        10 as the first overflow of digits is not a clear vlaue, it depends on the notation because its base is unclear.

        Ten as the English word is 100% defined. The issue is we translate seamlessly between the word and number, but there really is no confusion when writing ten. 10 in hex has a different english word: sixteen.

        English number names are mostly decimal-based, but their values are still fixed. Ten isn’t the word for “the first time our number system overflows”, it’s an amount.

        So I disagree. Ten will always be (…) this many, because it’s an English word.

        • psud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          If you are working in a different number system with other people ten loses its unique meaning just like any word that has another technical meaning.

          In code 0x10 is hex 10 (what you’d call sixteen), but in spoken technical English you don’t need to pronounce the 0x