A report commissioned by the Alberta government says the province would be entitled to more than half the assets of the Canada Pension Plan - $334 billion - if it were to exit the national retirement savings program in 2027.

  • Rocket@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no change in hands in what you describe. It would still be the same public asset, even if the public saw its transformation into something new.

    • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Who owns it doesn’t matter. What matters is that it isn’t paved or developed. Pavement and digging basements reduce the land’s ability to absorb water, which can cause flooding and reduce groundwater availability in surrounding areas.

      • Rocket@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Who owns it does matter when talking about privatization. Your definition of a public asset has no way to transfer ownership. It will forever and always be a public asset.

        • prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s only a public asset as long as it’s untouched (i.e. not paved or developed). The Greenbelt laws keep it that way.

          Think of the Rocky Mountains as a public asset. I don’t know who owns them, but that doesn’t matter. They are a public asset as long as they exist, but if someone is allowed to flatten them, or carve the faces of dead prime ministers into them, they are no longer an asset to the public. Both of those are much more difficult to do than it is to build a house or a parking lot, so I’m not terribly worried about that scenario unfolding, but it’s the same idea, just bigger.