Nato members have pledged their support for an “irreversible path” to future membership for Ukraine, as well as more aid.

While a formal timeline for it to join the military alliance was not agreed at a summit in Washington DC, the military alliance’s 32 members said they had “unwavering” support for Ukraine’s war effort.

Nato has also announced further integration with Ukraine’s military and members have committed €40bn ($43.3bn, £33.7bn) in aid in the next year, including F-16 fighter jets and air defence support.

The bloc’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said: “Support to Ukraine is not charity - it is in our own security interest.”

    • dwalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Should anyone start invading when their feelings are getting hurt now?

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        How did the US feel when Cuba allowed russia to put weapons there? Let me answer the question; Kennedy threatened complete war and the destsruction of the world. Should the Soviets have put weapons in Cuba?

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Cool, you didnt answer the question. The problem is that if you actually think about it for a second you will realize how this whole thing was directly caused by NATO/American interference. I am not infavor of countries invading but its not the “UNPROVOKED!!” bullshit line they keep repeating. This war was completely avoidable.

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      They should feel that they lost the cold war and their kleptocracy isn’t conductive to expanding their already reduced sphere of influence, so they better make peace with the fact.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Since they dont feel this and feel directly threatened, why should NATO/America keep pushing it till war?

        • Damage@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          'cause they can. There’s no good guys in international politics, you can check out an history book to confirm that.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So are you going to be the one sent overseas to die in a country that most people dont care anything about?

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You are claiming that they can do what they want, but that is backed by boots on the ground. Is that going to be you, or are you going to force my children to fight your wars?

                • Damage@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I don’t see how it’s necessary to explain what is there for everyone to see: they got Ukrainians fighting for them (well, and themselves as well), then if that’s not enough, the closest NATO countries will probably get into it.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    And when the war goes global or nuclear and the US sends troops overseas for you dumb war, are you going or are you going to try to force my kids to die for you instead?

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The care because they believe it is a direct move of aggression and endangers their people. Why did the US care during the Cuban missile crisis?