Credit to reddit user dggrd

  • cxg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not how I’m reading it- seems to be implying there’s credible evidence that some information hasn’t been released to congress

    • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just read it again, and you are definitely right.

      Thanks for bringing it up. Definitely a misleading title on my part.

      • cxg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope that I didn’t come off as combative- I apologize if I did so! It was unintentional.

        I think this is still possibly pretty important- if the gov has UAP info that they tried to avoid mandatory declassification, that could be the real juicy stuff

        • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No worries! I didn’t take it that way at all.

          Garry Nolan talked on a podcast for 29 minutes or so about this amendment and he’s also very optimistic about the language used.