I hope that I didn’t come off as combative- I apologize if I did so! It was unintentional.
I think this is still possibly pretty important- if the gov has UAP info that they tried to avoid mandatory declassification, that could be the real juicy stuff
I just read it again, and you are definitely right.
Thanks for bringing it up. Definitely a misleading title on my part.
I hope that I didn’t come off as combative- I apologize if I did so! It was unintentional.
I think this is still possibly pretty important- if the gov has UAP info that they tried to avoid mandatory declassification, that could be the real juicy stuff
No worries! I didn’t take it that way at all.
Garry Nolan talked on a podcast for 29 minutes or so about this amendment and he’s also very optimistic about the language used.