• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    Basically, crowdstrike wrote bad code that run as a driver, windows doesn’t like bad code in their drivers. Kernel level code is generally expected to run properly. crowdstrike’s kernel level code was really bad. Embarrassingly bad.

    If the host creates a playlist and everyone can add their favorite song to the playlist, the host won’t be blamed if you add “erika”. People rightfully think you are an ignorant weirdo or a bad person, not the host.

    • InfiniteFlow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      OTOH, if you build a playlist manager for playlists everyone can add to, you make sure nothing anyone adds will break it…

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except that the playlists are super complex and there is no way to make sure. Like building an engine and having to make sure that no 3rd party accessory will break it. Like the parented “sand injector”.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        They were legally not allowed to as part of an agreement to not be s monopoly and allow competition.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          What do you think WHQL is?

          The problem with CrowdStrike’s solution is that they got csagent.sys driver signed by WHQL, and the driver will download p-code from the internet and execute it. This allows them to push out changes without waiting for Microsoft approval.

          The biggest problem occurs when you don’t sanitize your inputs and someone accidentally uploads a blank file padded with zeroes. The driver dereferences a null value, and crashes your system. Hard.

          • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t want to argue with you and I admit that my phrasing wasn’t ideal but I assumed that it was obvious that i was talking about everything that would be executed on the machine. Apparently it wasn’t.

            • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ahh. Approving every piece of software would make them… Apple.

              You did say “driver”, and Microsoft typically approves every single driver on the majority of PCs.