• mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I understand that, which brings up the second baffling point that someone went to facebook to search for insurance providers in the first place.

    • ink@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re baffled people went on one of the most used website in the world to search for something. bruh…

      • mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I am baffled that anyone, with Facebook’s reputation for ads, selling personal information, etc, would choose to search for insurance carriers there instead of any number of other options that aren’t that big a leap away from Facebook, bruh.

        • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are so many people who literally think Facebook is the internet and every other website is just a really personalized facebook page.

            • max@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              While I find it equally stupid as you do, you mustn’t forget that the overwhelming majority of users on the internet aren’t techies like us.

              • mateomaui@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                If this was grandma on AOL I would probably agree, but this person is cogent enough to actually file a lawsuit because the place she went to search didn’t serve her the ads she wanted. Hard to believe she didn’t also know at the very least that Google or Bing are options. I wouldn’t expect her to know about DuckDuckGo for instance.

                edit: and the “95%” part of that reply was what made it more doubtful than anything. If people didn’t make such ridiculous overreaching claims, they’d be more believable. The exaggerations aren’t necessary or valid.

                • max@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Fair. Though it still makes me doubt it a little bit. It is still an American woman we’re talking about. Suing is your national pastime, isn’t it?

                  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I guess. What’s the point in having legal rights if you can’t wield them in court for profit?