In this paper the author highlights how both engineers and social scientists misinterpret the relationship between technology and society. In particular he attacks the narrative, widespread among engineers, that technological artifacts, such as software, have no political properties in themselves and that function or efficiency are the only drivers of technological design and implementation.

  • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My friend it is you who is socially inept. Trans people are not basement dwelling “politicals” most of us are just normal every day folks with jobs and partners etc. who just want to be respected to the same level that everyone else is.

    I have never even heard of this browser but it’s clear the maintainers have priorities of pushing an agenda rather than designing software to meet end user requirements and I wish them well and hope they can learn to set aside their ideology.

    Fundamentally it also doesn’t even have to be about that either, gender-neutral is a factual grammatic term and it’s silly to suggest using gender-neutral pronouns is some sort of political act.

    If anything it’s Andreas who made it political by taking it so personally in his head, which he did because of political bogeymen in his head, he got triggered by a term and now the chuddie defense force rushes to his side in the latest culture war battleground.

    • redisdead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You are right, gender neutral pronouns aren’t political. Having an internet meltdown because someone didn’t use them is.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        But as far as I understand someone just requested he did, and then it was Andreas who had the meltdown, hence the accusations of politicization?