• realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    When did I say I didn’t like their decision? I said I wanted more information.

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        For the same reason anyone wants to know anything. Because if anyone is to have an informed conversation about this, we need to know how they come to their conclusions. Their lack of transparency is a large part of why this controversy exists in the first place.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s none of your business what’s between their legs or in their chromosomes. This wouldn’t even be a question for anyone who wasn’t an athlete.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Which do you think would be more likely to discourage girls and women from participating in competitive sports, the chance that they might have to compete against a “real” woman or the requirement that they let everyone else know about their private medical records?

              • realitista@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t think any of this matters until you get to college level or olympic level sports, at which point I highly doubt it would dissuade any would be competitor. But I do think if it got bad enough it could dissuade women. For example, if you just let men compete openly and without scrutiny in any women’s athletics competition, which seems to be what some people are advocating for here.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I don’t think any of this matters until you get to college level or olympic level sports

                  The youngest Olympian this year was 12. The youngest Olympian ever was 11.

                  at which point I highly doubt it would dissuade any would be competitor.

                  Why? Why would any woman want to not only prove their biological sex, but allow that private medical information to be public?

                  For example, if you just let men compete openly and without scrutiny in any women’s athletics competition

                  How about letting women compete openly and without scrutiny in any men’s athletics competition? Shouldn’t men be tested too?

                  • realitista@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    All of this I’ve covered in this thread except the last point.

                    I don’t have any problem with women competing openly and without scrutiny in men’s athletics competition because I can’t think of any sport where it would confer an advantage. If there were one, I would be against it in that sport. Though safety would still need to be a consideration in any contact sport.

                    Also worth mentioning, I am not against the idea of getting away from the idea of having sports separated by sex completely, and somehow tiering them by ability. But I think that would be exceedingly difficult to do in a way where it was safe and fair for everyone, especially when it comes to boxing and martial arts. But for other non contact sports, I don’t see any reason to have a division by sex at all, just have tiers from best to worst.