• zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tax breaks remove potential future tax revenue, but aren’t spending tax revenue acquired from another source.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        But with a tax break in an emerging business, that revenue wouldn’t otherwise exist because the company wouldn’t have opened operations here when it could take advantage of egregious US subsidies instead.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re falling into something akin to the broken window fallacy. Economic resources aren’t created or destroyed by incentives, they are shifted. If that tax break didn’t exist those loans, employees, potential capital etc… would be doing something else. Tax breaks need to be extremely precisely honed to avoid lowering future income.

          • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Economic growth doesn’t happen on its own. The Canadian economy isn’t some entity that magically sees growth without investment.

              • Rocket@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Did you accidentally read “does” instead of “doesn’t”? Supply and demand being intrinsically linked is why economic growth does not happen on its own. If there was some way to separate them, then economic growth could theoretically happen on its own, but as that notion lives with fairytales and unicorns…