• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I live about two miles from the city center of one of the 20 biggest cities in the United States by population. The nearest suburb to me is over ten miles away, in the opposite direction. The density of my neighborhood, according to the most recent census data, is over 3,000 (the definition of “city” is over 1,500). We’re governed by city government and have no HOA. We get city trash pickup and our roads are maintained by the city DOT. We have city bus service and bike lanes maintained by the city. Our address includes the city name and zip code.

          By pretty much any definition, I live in a major city and not in a suburb.

              • Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                My original response is in the context of the dude I originally responded to and the dude he responded to. In that same context, what’s your point? Parks are tough to get to when you live in an incredibly expensive area?

                • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  No. My point is that many cities in the United States are built to require both personal vehicles and private yards, meaning that if you want to both live in the city and also do anything outside, your options are limited.

        • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          What do you mean? Almost every major city has suburbs (at least in my country). I live in one of the top ten most populous cities in the US and I live in the suburbs.

          • Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Do you think the municipalities that surround major cities exist as part of the city? Is Brookfield ‘Chicago’? Is Ferndale ‘Detroit’? Is Long Island ‘New York City’? Is Somerville ‘Boston’?

            • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yes. Long Island is New York City. I lived there and my address said New York, New York.

              I brain farted. I lived in Staten Island, but the point stands. Staten Island is a suburb of New York and is in New York. My current living situation is identical with respect to my current major city. I live in a suburb, but my address says the name of the major city.

              • Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Your point does not stand. Staten Island is not a suburb of New york. It is IN the boundary of New York City the same way Brooklyn is in the bounds of New York. That’s why your address says New York.

                • CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  That’s not how suburbs work. Suburbs aren’t about municipalities - they’re about zoning and proximity to an urban area. You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about and want to disagree with people who have first hand experience, so I’m not going to argue with you about this. Have a good one