• PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      3 months ago

      … no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected…

      So having previously served two years exactly is allowed.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        If we’re being pedantic, Harris already served as acting president for 1h25m on November 19, 2021 while Biden underwent a colonoscopy. If hypothetically Biden had died or resigned exactly 2 years into his term (January 20, 2023 12pm ET), and Harris assumed the presidency for the remaining two years, her total time would be over 2 years and she would be ineligible for a second term.

          • illi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m always pedantic, except when I’m not 😂

            So you are not always pedantic. So you are not really pedantic if you said you are always but are not… unless you were pedantic about saying you are not always pedantic?

          • kn33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            In that case, could she have her new VP take over for a few hours to negate that time she accumulated previously?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        New conspiracy theory: The reason the US has only incredibly old presidential candidates is because the VPs are pulling all the strings.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I am not sure. From the wording above, it sounds to me that you can get elected as VP and then kill your boss 25 months into the term indefinitely. Loophole!

        • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          3 months ago

          If you are just going to go that route, you don’t need to wait the 25 months. Just keep getting picked for vp, ice them immediately and take over. Don’t run for reelection, just get the vp nod on the next ticket, rinse and repeat. If you think that sounds preposterous, remember we are on the cusp of re-electing a racist rapist with a spray tan.

          • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            Who blatantly tried to stage a coup, in front of the entire world, and the majority of his stooges are going to jail left and right for corruption.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 months ago

          Boss doesn’t need to die, just resign. You could literally just have a sham person be elected as the “president” and then resign on Day 1 each time to keep someone as president indefinitely.

          Assuming voters played along with that of course.

          • azimir@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            You don’t need the voters. You need the states.

            We’re about to find out what happens when states refuse to recognize the winner of the Electoral College. Georgia, Arizona, and likely other states are going to fuck the state votes and refuse to certify.

            If you can get enough state reps and congressional reps to vote for you each cycle (as VP), then take over from the sham president, you could effectively be president forever.

            • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Technically the state reps and congressional reps need to be voted in too, so the voters have some power, even if gerrymandering makes it less than it should be.