• ijeff@lemdro.idM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Might be too small of a difference to matter with their implementation. As an aside, the 24 hr battery life is a disappointment IMO.

      • rutenl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The advantage mentioned in the article is easier connection to the charger and slightly faster charging

        • gelberhut@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          yes, but google itself claimed nothing. If it would really reduce heating and reduce energy needed to charge the watch - google would mentioned this - this is good for the environment.
          according to data I have seen charging speed improvement is formal like 65 min instead of 70 for 0 to 100% and same time from 0 to 50%

          I assume that the real reason either cost reduction or space for extra sensors.