$25 to rent the movie, one watch within max 24 hours after you start watching it… Or $5 more to own it. Scammers.

  • atomWood@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spending $30 to own a brand new movie that just came out is not something I have a problem with.

    However, not being able to download a copy of the movie you purchased is where I take issue.

    • Zach@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 year ago

      $30 to own the movie is valid, but for $5 less, you’re only allowed 1 watch within 24 hours of starting. Something like that shouldn’t be basically the same price as the movie. With pricing like this, they basically force you to spend the extra $5. There isn’t even a point to rent the movie and they know that.

    • pup_atlas@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t get a physical piece of media that can be viewed offline indefinitely, you don’t own anything, you’re just renting. Services revoking even bought and paid for content is not unheard of, digital purchasing gives every streaming company the ability to do that.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are legally entitled to do so, sure.

        Doesn’t make up for the false implication that you are “purchasing” the movie in any commonly understood meaning of the word. And if there was any alternative where you own a full res digital format, maybe the outrage could be said to be misplaced, but there isnt, and it’s not.