• FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, Waterfox is just another browser built on top of the Mozilla’s GECKO engine. But without all the AI dickriding.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      How terrible to offer client-side translation or webpage description for differently abled people!

              • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                LLM and ML generated translations generate a series of tokens individually. That’s why AI Chatbots hallucinate so often, they decide the next most likely word in a sequence is “No” when the correct answer would be “Yes” and then the rest of the prompt devolves into convincing nonsense. Machines are incapable of any sort of critical thinking to discern correct from incorrect to decide whether to use contextual responses.

                • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Those are not examples, just what you claim will happen based on what you think you understand about how LLM works.

                  Show me examples of what you meant. Just run some translations in their AI translator or something and show me how often they make inaccurate translations. Doesn’t seem that hard to prove what you claimed.

                  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You want examples but you never disclosed which product you’re asking about, and why should I give a damn in the first place? I shouldn’t have to present an absence of evidence of it working to prove it doesn’t work.