• stifle867@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure the ICC is keeping a close eye on what transpires during this war. Perhaps, it’s too much to ask that the perpetrators of war crimes face the consequences of their decisions.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve noticed though that these international bodies aren’t really effective at handling these types of conflicts.

      Was anything done about Azerbaijan invading Armenia? Nope.

      League of Nations 2.0.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure they did. They invaded the part of Aremina that was literally inside Azerbaijan’s borders, because Armenia seized it through conquest a few decades back after the USSR’s collapse, and proceeded with a “population exchange”.

          Btw how did “population exchange” become popularized to use instead of ethnic cleansing? I genuinely don’t know, but I’ve seen it alot lately.

        • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I mean Azerbaijan have invaded Armenia proper in the past in skirmishes, but Armenia also invaded Azerbaijan and gained territory from it… They’ve also both committed genocide against each other, with the region in the news recently for Armenians being expelled/killed/leaving following Azerbaijan recapturing it only being majority Armenian due to the Azeris being expelled/killed/leaving in the 90s…

          In reality it’s a situation very similar to Israel/Palestine where regardless of how it started/what the “original” status of the land was, both sides are so overwhelmingly awful in their actions that there’s no good guy, but of the four places mentioned only Palestine (Hamas really) has such a disdain for all people, even their own, that they stand out as worse than the others to me

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, a lot of the time it just feels like the flavour of the moment. Something is better than nothing however and whataboutism isn’t a valid argument against, but can be used to point out hypocrisy.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      People use the word war crime incorrectly so often it has no meaning.

      Read the article, there was no war crime. They missed their target and this family was hit.

      People have lost how shitty war is for everyone. War is awful.

      People also need to learn the rules of war and stop saying everything is a war crime.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can you cite which one you think is a violation?

          Also cite the corresponding rule you think was violated ?

          Civilians getting killed is not an automatic violation of any rules.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you going for points by adding nothing to the discussion ? Do you think you added any value by trying to throw out a worthless quip?

              In what way is there a war crime? In the article they clearly show there wasn’t a war crime.

          • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Can’t speak for him, but off the top of my head…

            Article 49 of the 4th Geneva convention accords:

            49: Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as
            deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the
            territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country,
            occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.

            Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or
            partial evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or
            imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not
            involve the displacement of protected persons outside the bounds of
            the occupied territory except when for material reasons it is
            impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall
            be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area
            in question have ceased.

            The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations
            shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper
            accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that
            the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene,
            health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family
            are not separated.

            The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and
            evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
            The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an
            area particularly exposed to the dangers of war unless the security
            of the population or imperative military reasons so demand.
            The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its
            own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

            I don’t hate Israel, in fact I think it is in America’s best interest to protect our spy network assets. Though, I will not stand for people making misleading statements about war crimes. We can do better.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t see how 49 has anything to do with air strikes.

              49 is about moving people from an occupied area.

              • HuddaBudda@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t see how 49 has anything to do with air strikes.

                It has to do with an active warzone or areas hitherto, which Israel just declared.

                Keep in mind, I am not even looking at their past, I am looking at the here and now and seeing what they are doing,

                49 is about moving people from an occupied area.

                Which Hamas currently… occupies… the southern part of Israel.

                Unless Israel is just fighting civilians, then we have a whole other set of war crimes.

      • zerfuffle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel isn’t exactly operating with improvised explosives. Israel is one of the most well-funded militaries in the region and has enough Western guided munitions to fend off all their neighbours.

        Either Western munitions are absolute garbage or Israel is going “oopsie doopsie I totally didn’t see those civilians!”

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Western munitions are great but not perfect.

          Israel even designed special weapons just for the occupied lands.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It isn’t.

          I think people should take some courses on war crimes. I have.

          Accidentally hitting the wrong building is not a war crime. Even if that building is marked with a Red Cross.

          People need to realize war is shit. It’s not a video game. People die, buildings get destroyed, and crying war crime is stupid.

          We should try to avoid wars whenever it’s possible.

          • Collision Resistance@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you are naive enough to think that a bombing a “jam-packed refugee camp” was an honest mistake, then I have a bridge to sell you, going very very cheap.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              That is an easy way to say you never served in the military.

              While movies show the military as a well-oiled machine flawless in execution, in the real world, it is functional chaos.

              Mistakes happen.

              • Collision Resistance@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Blowing up buildings and jam-packed refugee camps, knowing fully well that it’ll create mass civilian casualties is a war crime. And I’d rather take the word of experts rather than a nobody over this.

                Quoting from the article itself

                But human rights groups have previously said that Israel’s pattern of deadly attacks on residential homes display a disregard for the lives of Palestinian civilians and argued they may amount to war crimes.

                The article quotes a previous article Human Rights Watch: Israeli war crimes apparent in Gaza war

                Human Rights Watch on Tuesday accused the Israeli military of carrying out attacks that “apparently amount to war crimes” during an 11-day war in May against the Hamas militant group.

                The international human rights organization issued its conclusions after investigating three Israeli airstrikes that it said killed 62 Palestinian civilians. It said “there were no evident military targets in the vicinity” of the attacks.

                So yeah, brush it off as “Mistakes happen” somewhere else

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That isn’t a war crime.

                  Israel notified the area that war was starting, they told all civilians to flee. They use decision motions and notify the targets they will be hit.

                  Israel is going out of their way to avoid civilian loses and exceeds the standards of war.

                  Hamas is hiding in civilian areas which increases the chance of the civilian loses.

                  Israel isn’t at fault here. They’re trying to destroy legit military targets.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The conversation was around the Israelis. I am aware Hamas has committed war crimes. In the article I didn’t see where Israel committed a war crime.

              • stifle867@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                My original comment never explicitly called out Israel nor Hamas, and for good reason. You’re the one that claimed, and I quote, “read the article, there was no war crime”. The line I quoted was pulled directly from the article.

                I’m sure now you will be correcting your original claim, right?

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  AH you’re being pedantic to be pedantic. We were talking about Israel and you wanted to pretend we were talking about Hamas.

                  No, I will not be adjusting anything as we were clearly talking about Israel.

                  • stifle867@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No, YOU were talking about Israel. My comment was “clearly” as general as I could make it. You replied to MY original comment, the onus is on you to understand the subject of my comment.

                    Instead of being intellectually honest about your mixup, you’re re-defining the goal posts. You challenged me to find a single part in the article that would classify as a war crime and to also provide the exact war crime committed. I did exactly that, as requested.