• LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    198 Posts

    1.24K Comments

    Joined 1 month

    Source: https://lemmy.ml/u/UniversalMonk@lemmy.world

    If it took only 10 seconds to post each time, and 20 seconds to make a comment, that means you have spent:

    (198 * 10) + (1240 * 20) = 26780 seconds
    

    Or, 7.44 hours, in one month. That’s almost 5% the amount of time people spend working full time. Almost a full work day. And these are extremely generous estimates that assume you are very fast. I have no doubt you have spent minutes responding to some of the comments calling you out.

    A more realistic set of numbers would be

    (198 * 30) + (1240 * 45) = 61740 seconds
    

    Or, 17.15 hours, in one month. That’s almost 43% the amount of time people spend working full time. Over 2 full work days.

    To calculate the number of times you submitted content per waking hour:

    (198 + 1240) / (16 * 30) = 3
    

    Or once every 20 minutes on average, assuming you sleep. Almost every single one promoting third party candidates. Totally and completely not sus, at all. Not even a little bit.

      • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Of course. You would only explain why you post three times per hour

        • in favor of third party candidates
        • suddenly, starting 3 months before the election
        • increasing in frequency after the debate
        • despite the massive amount of critical comments you get

        If the explanation would not get you permabanned.

              • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                2 months ago

                You apparently are pretty confused. “you have to” and “you would” are extremely different phrases, and I never once implied they were similar. Only that you wouldn’t need to pretend “the articles are interesting” is your motivation, in a context which implicates you as sketch af, if you weren’t sketch af.

                You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are. I guess it’s possible you’re a masochist who likes being insulted, but I think the other explanation is much more likely ;)

                • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are.

                  I don’t care if “thousands” of people are telling me how “horrible” I am. I can post what I want as long as it fits the community guidelines. And I will continue to do so.

                  And I don’t have to explain anything to you. Thank you!

                  • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I don’t have to explain anything to you

                    Again, no one said you had to. But you would, if there weren’t something insidious behind this bizarre behavior.

            • ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              No one owes you an explanation for anything, You’re demanding an explanation for someone else’s actions the same way that Democrats demand votes from everyone. They’re not entitled and you were not entitled.