Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 months agoIf the obscenely wealthy benefit most from having Republicans in power; and collectively they have disproportionate control over the economy; wouldn't they use that power to sabotage Democrats?message-squaremessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up172
arrow-up172message-squareIf the obscenely wealthy benefit most from having Republicans in power; and collectively they have disproportionate control over the economy; wouldn't they use that power to sabotage Democrats?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squarecrashfrog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoWho said anything about slavery? What are you talking about?
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoIf you’re going to post so many comments, at least read the chain. Otherwise someone might mistake you for a troll.
minus-squarecrashfrog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI mean I am the chain, I’m asking you what the fuck you’re talking about and you’re really bad at having clear ideas
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoOh, perfect recall then? In that case you know exactly where in your line of 5 year old style questioning that slavery was mentioned.
minus-squarecrashfrog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSocratic questioning goes back a lot longer than 5 years, stupid
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThat is not the Socratic method. Questioning how the CEO of a corporation has control over pricing is just trolling.
minus-squarecrashfrog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoNo, I’m asking you to explain why you think prices are arbitrary in contravention of essential economics.
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoOh you see, you could have asked that way up there. And I’d tell you that you’re operating from a flawed premise. Economics actually talks quite a lot about monopoly power and rent seeking.
minus-squarecrashfrog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago Oh you see, you could have asked that way up there. I did. Economics actually talks quite a lot about monopoly power and rent seeking. Do you? This is the first you’ve mentioned either. What’s the “monopoly” in the situation we’re discussing?
Who said anything about slavery? What are you talking about?
If you’re going to post so many comments, at least read the chain. Otherwise someone might mistake you for a troll.
I mean I am the chain, I’m asking you what the fuck you’re talking about and you’re really bad at having clear ideas
Oh, perfect recall then? In that case you know exactly where in your line of 5 year old style questioning that slavery was mentioned.
Socratic questioning goes back a lot longer than 5 years, stupid
That is not the Socratic method. Questioning how the CEO of a corporation has control over pricing is just trolling.
No, I’m asking you to explain why you think prices are arbitrary in contravention of essential economics.
Oh you see, you could have asked that way up there. And I’d tell you that you’re operating from a flawed premise. Economics actually talks quite a lot about monopoly power and rent seeking.
I did.
Do you? This is the first you’ve mentioned either. What’s the “monopoly” in the situation we’re discussing?