CalamityEmu@ttrpg.network to RPGMemes @ttrpg.networkEnglish · 2 days agoShamelessly stolen because I love itttrpg.networkimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1634
arrow-up1634imageShamelessly stolen because I love itttrpg.networkCalamityEmu@ttrpg.network to RPGMemes @ttrpg.networkEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 days ago The spell allows polygamy Does the +2 stack in that case?
minus-squareArchpawn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·19 hours agoNo. Benefits from spells of the same name do not stack.
minus-squareJeeve65@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 days agoNo, the spell is only cast once, for all partners at the same time. “A creature can benefit from this rite again only if widowed”.
minus-squareIron Lynx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 days agoDoes it stack though? If n people cast ceremony on a party, does that mean they get +2n AC? EDIT: I read the rules. And completely read over the latter part of your comment. “A creature can benefit from this rite again only if widowed.” 😢
Does the +2 stack in that case?
No. Benefits from spells of the same name do not stack.
No, the spell is only cast once, for all partners at the same time. “A creature can benefit from this rite again only if widowed”.
Does it stack though? If n people cast ceremony on a party, does that mean they get +2n AC?
EDIT: I read the rules. And completely read over the latter part of your comment. “A creature can benefit from this rite again only if widowed.” 😢