“These attacks violate the human right to life, absent any indication that the victims posed an imminent lethal threat to anyone else at the time.”

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you the same guy who sent me a link and called me an idiot for not reading it even though it supported my point?

            • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s just that I have no idea what you are talking about, you have been wrong several times, and refuse to clarify what you mean about anything. Basically this is a dead end conversation.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Oop there you go again, it’s not terrorism by your definition so you abandon your definition. Neat.

                • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I have no idea what you are talking about and I stand by my definition of terrorism.

                  Edit: also just noticed that you’ve been taking the time to down vote all of my comments. Lol.

                  • Madison420@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Then neither country is taking terrorist act.

                    Boo hoo? What’s your point aside from crying about you and m that had no bearing on how wrong you are