• crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    This would be the typical Dem strategy - extremely targeted so as not to accidentally open the floodgates for additional impactful legislation to get passed. Just barely enough to campaign on for the next election cycle.

    But hey, I’ll take a smidgeon of hope for something more.

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s also the most likely way of getting a bill passed without requiring a Senate super majority. The Grand obstructionist party doesn’t want to lose their one move when they don’t have presidential veto for general so it’s probably going to take a super majority to break up the 30+ year long gridlock since the last amendment was passed, but if you target specific usages and committee procedures you can try to turn the conservative representatives who were personally affected by the law.