• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 days ago

    Under those rules, streaming services that are not Canadian-owned and have more than CAD $25 million (approx. USD $18.5 million)  in revenue in Canada annually are required to pay 5% of that revenue into funds that subsidize Canadian content and creators.

    Under that plan, 1.5% of music streamers’ revenue would go towards subsidies for local radio stations.

    Lol, yea, pay your fucking taxes, grifters.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Interesting that they’re pumping back money into traditional radio.

      The letter argued that Canada’s radio regulations were designed to address the problems created by its vast geography, its “linguistic duality” (English and French), and the fact that space on analog radio is limited, making decisions about what gets broadcast necessary.

      Gee, that’s not the history I remember. I’m not super familiar, but wasn’t it about holding back Americanisation? (We have band allocations separately)

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sure. That just means that Canadian consumers of Spotify will be indirectly subsidizing Canadian artists.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I see no problem here.

          Well, assuming you see having domestic content as a valid goal, anyway, which isn’t necessarily a given.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        If I remember something kn my econ 101 class, they’re going up 2.5%, because taxes are not entirely pass to the consumer, they take a part of the company earnings too.

        • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          He ce Spotify prives going up 10, to make sure company profits are covered and then some

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sure but then they pay more taxes. Increase in price means more revenue which means more taxes. It’s just a circle.

        • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          That’s why they raise it by 10%, not 5%.

          Say sub is currently $100/year, they now have to pay $5, they get $5 less. If they raise by 5% to $105, they have to pay $5.25, they get 25c less than originally. But if they raise to $110, they have to pay $5.50, and suddenly they are getting $4.50 more than before, even though they are paying more taxes. And they can blame it on this so people don’t hate them as much and accept it.