• The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s a real bummer interviewing these external applicants that you know won’t get the job. Like I wish I could just let them know, but we’re required to go through the entire interview process.

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      As someone in the inside, what’s the rationale behind having to publicly post jobs like this? Why can’t you just offer the job to the person you want to give it to?

      • Norin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        In academia (my line of work) they’re required to have positions posted and open for a certain amount of time, interview a certain number of applicants, etc.

        In theory, it’s for equal opportunity and finding the best person for the job.

        In practice, it’s a waste of time, money, and hope.

      • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        47 minutes ago

        Likely corporate and/or legal politics. I would imagine things not unlike EEOP loopholing would play a big role in it. (Yes, gov’ment we are offering this opening to “anyone”. So, send that funding check right over)