• apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Expect anti Union article titles like this too. This article content is ok and while it is alarming how we rely on bananas so much and cannot grow them domestically, I think consumers should expect to focus their frustrations on the company, not on striking workers. One set the conditions for the need for a strike, the other is just trying to get a fair slice of the banana. I certainly hope that Biden doesn’t step in and use the cooling off period, which is pro-management.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      After the Railworkers strike, I’ve read that the Biden administration actually got the owners to make concessions to the railworkers, though it didn’t seem to receive any press at the time, other than when railworkers had to go back to work.

      • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah that is true, but it was significantly less than the rail workers were asking for. Still a fucking sham to obviate the union’s biggest pressure point for management.

        Plus you had tons of media on the side of the company and consumers, instead of the workers. There is never enough media centering the workers, their material concerns and demands, and what they are sacrificing.