• Veraticus@lib.lgbt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh, you again – it’s incredibly ironic you’re talking about wrong statements when you are basically the poster child for them. Nothing you’ve said has any grounding in reality, and is just a series of bald assertions that are as ignorant as they are incorrect. I thought you would’ve picked up on it when I started ignoring you, but: you know nothing about this and need to do a ton more research to participate in these conversations. Please do that instead of continuing to reply to people who actually know what they’re talking about.

      • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You clearly don’t actually care; if you did, you wouldn’t select your sources to gratify your ego, but actually try to understand the problem here. For example, ask GPT4 itself if it is intelligent. It will instruct you far better than I ever can. You clearly have access to it – frame your objections to it instead of Internet strangers tired of your bloviating and ignorance.

        • BitSound@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand you’re upset, but my sources have been quite clear and straightforward. You should actually read them, they’re quite nicely written.

          • Veraticus@lib.lgbt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am upset: you don’t know what you’re talking about, refuse to listen to anything that contradicts you, and are inflammatory and unpleasant besides. If I wasn’t clear enough – go talk to an LLM about this. They have no option but to listen to your idiocy. I, of course, do have a choice, and am blocking you.