Or Obama’s controversial 2008 trips to Israel & Berlin where he not only did he discuss US policy, but he was there to get the support of the government & its people for his policy proposals.
Here we have a picture of Obama meeting with the Israeli President in Jerusalem on 07/23/2008 prior to becoming President.
Oh, look, here Obama is standing next to a war criminal on July 23, 2008:
Now had you actually read the Logan Act and had a clue about anything, you’d know that the Logan Act is specifically about prohibiting private citizens from conducting foreign policy and is rarely enforced unless someone is trying to substantially influence foreign policy against the current US administration’s stance.
I see where you’re coming from though. If you demand a third-party presidential candidate call someone a war criminal then they must do on your timeline cause you have much more experience than an actual presidential candidate about how they can best achieve future negotiations, but when the President you elected won’t call Netanyahu a war criminal then it doesn’t really matter to you that much, especially considering that you want to get the campaign/party re-elected that has reassured Netanyahu that they’ll keep sending money for genocide.
I see you want to run away now… maybe Kamala HQ is calling you right now saying their pro-genocide statements aren’t doing as well as they hoped and them gushing over Dick Cheney’s support didn’t get the positive reaction they had hoped. I wonder if they’ve figured out that their commitment to Netanyahu isn’t a good choice considering he’s working against the Democrats.
This isn’t a court of law, Dr. Stein isn’t being charged, and I don’t need any evidence of anything except “Eh, seems fishy AF to me” just like everyone else in this thread, her actions (or lack of) are all the proof I need that she’s not fit for the office.
Okay, fine then don’t vote for her. But if you’re going to attack her and make claims that she’s a Russian agent without evidence while supporting a pro-genocide candidate then don’t expect others are going to want to vote Democrat when that is how a lot of the people in the party are acting.
Again your desperation is about painting pictures without evidence. However, you seem to forget things like this:
https://www.wsj.com/video/obama-medvedev-hot-mic-gaffe/5F7CF09D-CFD5-4805-A72C-3378D5F8371E
Or Obama’s controversial 2008 trips to Israel & Berlin where he not only did he discuss US policy, but he was there to get the support of the government & its people for his policy proposals.
Here we have a picture of Obama meeting with the Israeli President in Jerusalem on 07/23/2008 prior to becoming President.
Oh, look, here Obama is standing next to a war criminal on July 23, 2008:
Now had you actually read the Logan Act and had a clue about anything, you’d know that the Logan Act is specifically about prohibiting private citizens from conducting foreign policy and is rarely enforced unless someone is trying to substantially influence foreign policy against the current US administration’s stance.
I see where you’re coming from though. If you demand a third-party presidential candidate call someone a war criminal then they must do on your timeline cause you have much more experience than an actual presidential candidate about how they can best achieve future negotiations, but when the President you elected won’t call Netanyahu a war criminal then it doesn’t really matter to you that much, especially considering that you want to get the campaign/party re-elected that has reassured Netanyahu that they’ll keep sending money for genocide.
I see you want to run away now… maybe Kamala HQ is calling you right now saying their pro-genocide statements aren’t doing as well as they hoped and them gushing over Dick Cheney’s support didn’t get the positive reaction they had hoped. I wonder if they’ve figured out that their commitment to Netanyahu isn’t a good choice considering he’s working against the Democrats.
Try to be a little less obvious Vlad.
I provided actual evidence to counter your narrative, which is something you’ve yet to provide any evidence that Jill Stein is loyal to Russia, Benji.
This isn’t a court of law, Dr. Stein isn’t being charged, and I don’t need any evidence of anything except “Eh, seems fishy AF to me” just like everyone else in this thread, her actions (or lack of) are all the proof I need that she’s not fit for the office.
Okay, fine then don’t vote for her. But if you’re going to attack her and make claims that she’s a Russian agent without evidence while supporting a pro-genocide candidate then don’t expect others are going to want to vote Democrat when that is how a lot of the people in the party are acting.
ok