And since you won’t be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is… interesting to say the least.

  • sab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    184
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s such a potent example why everyone who cares need to stop using Chromium based browsers before it’s too late. Stunts like this would be much harder to pull if there wasn’t a de facto browser monopoly.

    • Dojan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s such a potent example why everyone who cares need to stop using Chromium based browsers before it’s too late. Stunts like this would be much harder to pull if there wasn’t a de facto browser monopoly.

      I’ve always been a proponent of unifying the internet under a single platform, be it Blink or Gecko I don’t really care. Chromium itself was built on FOSS technology, and has its roots in KHTML, which Apple later adopted as WebKit, and Google used and made Blink.

      The problem I see is when a single company has such a large monopoly. Chromium should be community-owned, and Google shouldn’t get the final say.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I’m concerned, the web should be developed through universal standards (the World Wide Web Consortium takes care of that), while the job of rendering engines should be reduced to following these standards the best they can.

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          following these standards as best they can

          This is precisely why I want a unified web. I hate adding flags for support and testing across different systems. It’s a massive bother, and ultimately means you’ll test one platform and just hope for the best on the rest because that’s what you have time for.

      • FoxBJK@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem I see is when a single company has such a large monopoly. Chromium should be community-owned, and Google shouldn’t get the final say.

        EU investigation is already underway for their ad business. Not sure that would apply to Chromium but owning the ad delivery, the website, AND the software that renders it should be considered.

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s such a potent example of why we need antitrust laws to actually be applied to tech companies.

      But our government here in the US is both run by geriatric idiots who don’t even know how to use a computer let alone regulate one and also is bought out by these companies.

      This is a blatant, out in the open anti-competitive action that is suggested in this article and it shouldn’t legally be allowed to stand, but our politicians understand so little about how technology works that they’ll blindly accept Google telling them that it isn’t monopolistic rather than actually try to understand it.

    • Zink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      For what it’s worth, this comment just inspired me to switch my work PC from edge to Firefox. Was already using it in Linux, and will switch my home PC tonight.