• megahertz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The concept of suitable housing as a right is too uncommon. I wish the US government would put more focus on tangible needs like housing, access to healthy food, and healthcare.

    • albigu@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they did that, the USA would sanction the USA. Can’t have those Marxist-Sanderists thinking they own the place.

      • megahertz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I feel like I might understand some of the impulse to restrict resources as a way to ensure all members contribute to society, we can see that this isn’t actually the outcome of such restrictions; this tells me that the motivation isn’t about improving society but rather improving the standing of a select few. It is all about power and control. How do we change the social structure at this point?

        • albigu@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do we change the social structure at this point?

          Here’s an idea that worked in the past!

          • megahertz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If we keep finding ourselves in another iteration of the problem, did it really work? There has to be a more permanent solution.

            • albigu@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Care to explain the “another iteration of the problem”? Abolishing slavery ends slavery, abolishing serfdom ends serfdom, abolishing rent ends rent. The Venezuelan case is an example of the latter. You asked how to change the social structure, here’s a tried and true method that has worked from Russia to China to Vietnam to Cuba. You’re free to present your own with better track records.

              • megahertz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see I was looking at the conversation from a wider perspective and likely misunderstood the context added by the image. I don’t disagree with your comment “abolishing ‘x’ ends ‘x’”. However, abolishing any given inequity, one at a time, in one area at a time is not the progress I was speaking of when I asked how to change social structure. Before we can abolish anything, we need people who believe it should be abolished, and we need enough of them to institute change. My question was directed more toward the earlier steps: identifying necessary change and then creating/maintaining a movement which can enact that change.

    • ToastyWaffle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can’t inventivize people to work to death if they have free housing and healthcare - some neoliberal probably