• dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ll find that, overall, it’s actually the opposite. Healthy people who have all of their basic needs covered feel a big incentive to do productive and valuable work. Sure, there will be the freeloader here and there. But in general, people want to do cool things, even boring or simple things, as long as they feel they are contributing to something good.

    • Cookiesandcreamclouds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yup. People WANT to work. And some people cannot afford to get jobs. Yes, I’m serious. Work clothes, a place to sleep, a permanent address, identification can all be barriers to employment.

    • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But in general, people want to do cool things, even boring or simple things, as long as they feel they are contributing to something good.

      Do people who retire contribute to society more or less than they did before retirement? Pensioners are the closest thing we have to a long-term UBI today.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an unfair comparison. A pensioner is someone that by definition already contributed the most they could to the economy. As experience has it, plenty of pensioners continue to work even after retirement.

        We have seen experiments with ubi and they almost unanimously conclude that it’s a net positive, people tend to find work that both they actually want to work in and have the most skill on. It improves work conditions overall as well. Instead of settling for worse conditions or unfit positions.

        Happy people are more efficient and productive. That’s a no brainer.

        • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          A pensioner is someone that by definition already contributed the most they could to the economy

          Not really. There are plenty of healthy early retirees. Do they on average contribute more or less than before they retired?

          As experience has it, plenty of pensioners continue to work even after retirement.

          What percentage? How does that compare to what they did before?

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Any early retiree is most likely a billionaire, so by definition they weren’t even contributing that much to begin with, probably just hoarding generational riches.

            • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Any early retiree is most likely a billionaire

              My kid’s teacher retired at 55. So you think she was a billionaire?

              so by definition they weren’t even contributing that much to begin with, probably just hoarding generational riches.

              So rich people don’t contribute to society because they don’t have to work in order to live. However, people under a UBI will be very productive because they don’t have to work in order to live?

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not engaging anymore, you don’t want to learn, you’re just constructing weird gotchas for outrage.

              • DoomsdaySprocket@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Arguably, under a UBI system people will not be pressured into jobs they aren’t good at or hate just because those jobs offer the wage they need to live. Demographically, “female-coded” jobs are undervalued, so I can see how a UBI would help level the playing field there especially.

                I can think of many times I’ve wondered why the hell a coworker is doing this job when they suck at it and seem to hate it. I’d love for those people to have the option to just get out without potentially parking themselves and their family at the food bank.

                • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Arguably, under a UBI system people will not be pressured into jobs they aren’t good at or hate just because those jobs offer the wage they need to live

                  Yep, I’ve been in that situation. It seems reasonable to imagine that with a UBI some of those people would quit their job. Now, with fewer people working, how do you pay for UBI and everything else? We already have a deficit and inflation.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Retired people can contribute time to their families, the community, and other non-capitalist endeavors. So could one spouse in a single income family, or those that don’t need to work for income, but to generate profit every adult is now expected to work and never retire.

        • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Retired people can contribute time to their families, the community, and other non-capitalist endeavors.

          Of course, and that’s great. But who pays for the UBI? Rich people? And what do we do when we have taken everything from them, or they move overseas?

          • snooggums@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They will get UBI too so worst case they hit the same floor as everyone else.

            But they will never reach that point because taxing the rich will never make them anything other than the richest of the population. They will still be rich, just with a smaller gap between them and everyone else.

            As a side note, why are you worried more about the rich than the poor?

            • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              As a side note, why are you worried more about the rich than the poor?

              I am not. I’m offering the argument that a UBI may well lead to a less productive population, which makes it even harder to maintain a UBI in the first place.

              They will get UBI too so worst case they hit the same floor as everyone else.

              But if there are no longer rich people to be taxed because they have been sucked dry then there is no source to fund the UBI. Hence the notion that “rich people will fund the UBI” doesn’t fly. Not to mention that wealthy people find it relatively easy to move to other countries with less taxes.

              • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The UBI is funded by not having 23 different agencies each with their own staff, red tape, and costly vetting processes.

                There are more than a few studies already done on UBI and they all conclude it is a benefit. Stop asking everyone else to quench your curiosity and do the work yourself. Or are you currently receiving UBI and don’t want to do any work?

                Foh