• Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think electing Kamala would increase division because the last time we had a black president the racists lost their fucking shit.

    To which I say: Good. Fuck those assholes. Die mad.

    • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is why I want a woman president so bad. Clinton was a weak candidate but Harris is stronger. Once Harris wins, the misogynists and incels will all lose their minds. So will the bigots and racists. It’s like one stone, hitting multiple angry hateful birds in one win.

      I want to see it. “GUD DAMN WOMUN NI…HOW DARE SHE WIN HGUHFSGHSG!!”

      • Kalkaline @leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Clinton had a hell of a resume for POTUS, but just isn’t the most likable candidate. The DNC really should have rallied behind Bernie Sanders and we might have pulled off 2016.

        • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          She’s a weak candidate considering that:

          She’s not the Bill Clinton that built America back up through the 90s that H.W Bush and Reagan ruined and prior to the Monica incident.

          She took away all momentum from Bernie Sanders, who people did actually want. This was 2016 so it was a chaotic mess where SJWs existed so they were more about “we need the first woman president to make history!” without caring that Hillary was the corporate representative side of the Democrats. Something we absolutely did not need.

          So she’s no Bill Clinton and Bernie Sanders was taken away from us. Now we were down between a rock and a hard place between Clinton and Trump. Sure, the popular vote might’ve been in Clinton’s favor. However I still to this day think that we just had no choice ultimately. Same venue with Biden vs Trump.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago
    The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for The Hill:

    Wiki: reliable - The Hill is considered generally reliable for American politics. The publication’s opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. The publication’s contributor pieces, labeled in their bylines, receive minimal editorial oversight and should be treated as equivalent to self-published sources.


    MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/4961486-arnold-schwarzenegger-endorses-harris-walz-trump-garbage/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support