Tidal is laying off more staff
www.theverge.com
The layoffs could affect up to 100 people.
  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    3·
    6 hours ago

    I hope it’s still the case as I have Tidal subscription, but they were the ones giving the most money per stream to the artist.

    I wouldn’t want to move to another streaming platform unless they are even better for artists.

  • drake@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
    5·
    7 hours ago

    I’m back to pirating all of my music. I will buy CDs or pay for downloads for artists that I really like or smaller artists, but I am fucking through with the streaming platforms. They just enshittify more and more.

    • vxx@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      11 hours ago

      A music app like Spotify founded by Jay-Z.

      The proposal was to pay the artists more.

      Sounds good, but I think the majority goes to the labels anyways, so it doesn’t change much for the artists.

      The main issue is executives basically enslaving their artists with “360 deal” contracts.

      • Virkkunen@fedia.io
        5·
        10 hours ago

        Spotify actually pays 70% of the streams to the label, which trickles down to a bunch of nothing for the artist. Tidal wanted to change that and pay directly to the artist

        • vxx@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          10 hours ago

          How is that possible if the labels own the music and there’s a contract that sets the percentages.

          All music streaming services say “paying the artist” in their communication.

    • Dempf@lemmy.zipEnglish
      2·
      11 hours ago

      Streams flac. Good supplement to piracy. I might switch to Qobuz sometime, but it works well for now.

      • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2·
        8 hours ago

        It seamlessly integrated your own local media with tidal. Instead of encoding or downloading, you could just add tidal music as if you had a physical copy of it. It could also be used for radio and plexamp mixes.

  • rjek@feddit.ukEnglish
    15·
    20 hours ago

    Wow is it still a thing? I had no idea. It always seemed to sit in this weird limbo between Spotify and YouTube Music (for people who just want to listen to music) and Qobuz and HD Tracks (for people who just want to listen to their new £250 power leads). Never sure what it was actually for.

    • TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      9·
      11 hours ago

      Their sound quality is just significantly better compared to Spotify. Even with my bluetooth earbuds I can hear the difference. Spotify and Youtube just sound muddy in comparison.

    • Rimu@piefed.socialEnglish
      31·
      18 hours ago

      I’ve had a Tidal subscription for about a year. It’s recommendation algo is way way better than Spotify and there are none of those spammy 1 minute tracks that Spotify has because ‘artists’ have gamed the system.

      They don’t have a Linux app but the PWA works fine. Minimize the window to reduce CPU usage (I know that sounds crazy but it actually works).

    • Drathro@dormi.zoneEnglish
      34·
      20 hours ago

      Cheaper than Spotify for the number of users it gives you (at least where I live) and the app itself has functioned significantly better than Spotify’s has in my experience so far while not depriving me of any of the artists and albums I listen to regularly. Early on in its life it was big time selling snake oil, but at this point it’s just a solid alternative to Spotify and YouTube music which have both, frankly, gotten “too big to fail” and have begun enshittification because of it. Man we need more competition…

      • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.orgEnglish
        3·
        11 hours ago

        HDtracks.

        That being said if you’re buying FLACs from major labels for $40 while indie bands release albums in FLAC via band camp for $3, you’re a chump.

        The members of Led Zeppelin that are still don’t need the money nearly as much, and even if they did most of it isn’t going to them anyways.