• renegadespork@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Now that Google isn’t allowed to pay them default search engine money, I think this was expected.

    Ideologically I think it’s a good thing the US government is challenging Google’s monopolistic practices. Unfortunately, that money was a massive percentage of Mozilla’s income.

    It really was short-sighted of them to put so many eggs into one basket.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 minutes ago

      Google hasn’t been forbidden from paying Mozilla - yet, at least. They’ve only been ruled a monopolist, but what consequences they will face is yet to be determined, and then the appeals process will follow, so it’ll be a couple of years before there’s any potential impact.

      Mozilla has also explicitly tried to have other baskets to put eggs in (Relay. VPN, Monitor Plus, Hubs, etc.), it’s just that none of those have been as successful.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Mozilla frankly could use some serious restructuring. If Brave was able to get a decent market share overnight surely a well known company can make a come back.

      Mozilla has a management problem

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Brave has a notable market share? I’ve never seen them in any graph.

        Comparing the two is also a difficult territory, because Brave does not develop their own browser engine. If Google stops publishing the Chromium source code, they’re gone in a few months.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This is the Mozilla foundation, not the Mozilla corp. The latter has the deal with Google; the former couldn’t make that deal even if they wanted to.