• bh64@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      yet another Kagi shiller.

      they are still pulling results from Bing. they are partially powered by their own engine, but it has a minor database of sites when compared to Bing.

      And needing to have an account is just horrible for privacy.

      • nooj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No it’s not horrible for privacy it’s literally just for billing which payment can be made anonymously too. They don’t even verify the email address you use. So much misinformation in this thread. Go Google your info before you present it as fact.

        • bh64@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          it is a fact. you have to be logged in to do a search or use an API key which directly associates your search query with your account.

          Let’s say you don’t give them a real email, that’s good. Maybe you’re using Tor or a VPN and they don’t get your IP. And somehow you manage to make your payment anonymously. That’s great.

          Well, Kagi is still getting all your search queries which are directly associated with one account. We don’t have their server’s code. We don’t know how or what are they logging. They can claim whatever in their privacy policy, I don’t care. A single entity is receiving all your search queries directly linked to your pseudonymous account. This gives them a vast amount of data about the person using it, even if they do not know who you are, probably very sensitive information too.

          Let’s make a huge assumption and assume they are not correlating your search queries and they do not use this information for anything. Well, a third party actor with access to their servers could very well make use of this vast amount of personal data, whether it is a government, their hosting provider, a malicious actor, a security breach, etc.

          And that’s considering the best case in which you were covering your tracks hiding your IP all the time and making anonymous payments, which, being honests, most Kagi users don’t do. So yeah, Kagi is a privacy nightmare.

          • nooj@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            To say it’s a privacy nightmare in the context of a Google thread is just not accurate. If they associated search queries with your account then they’d be breaking their own privacy policy and opening themselves up to lawsuits.

          • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I feel like this is a fair, even if incredibly skeptical, take on kagi. I am a kagi user and I had that exact thought when I started using it. How can you even function as a search engine if you dont capture searches at least in aggregate–so you can tune or shape your algorithms?

            That said, I didn’t start using them strictly for privacy. I started using them because they were giving me the best results I’d gotten from any search engine in a long time. And I didn’t have to

            And while I wouldn’t necessarily say Kagi is the gold-standard for privacy, their business model is, at the very least, aligned with providing good search results. Google is an advertising company masquerading as a search engine. They have some incredibly perverse incentives for how they delivery results.

        • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          wtf that was not misinformation. you need to be logged in when making searches, they can log everything you search server-side and tie it to the same person.

          every time I search something in SearXNG they have no way of telling I’m the same person if my IP has changed. but this is impossible with Kagi. they need to know your account.

          they have basically 0 transparency of their server side, we don’t have any code. It’s like trusting a VPN provider not to log your every connection because “trust me, bro”. this is a necessary risk for using a VPN but not for search engines and I wouldn’t recommend anyone to take such a risk when better alternatives exist.

            • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              a privacy policy, as I said, is a “trust me, bro”. they don’t give any actual proof.

              that by searching through a SearXNG instance in a .onion domain they have no idea of who I am and they can’t associate it with any other of my searches, is a verifiable fact.

              that Kagi isn’t correlating search logs, isn’t.

              I’ll trust verifiable facts over blind trust any day. and you should too.

    • vpklotar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been using Kagi for about a month now and can confidently say that it’s the best search engine I’ve used in the last few years, including Google. Will for sure renew and continue to use it, highly recommend it!

      • Fungah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kagi has a lot of room to improve but it’s still far better thab Google / Bing.

        I think Sunday prichai, and the entire executive team at google, should be brought up on charges of crimes against humanity for what they’ve done to our access to infirmstion.

        The judges will be the gods. We give them a specific piece of info they need to find with one Google search. If they can get it in the first try, they move onto the next round. If not then they lose a limb. 7 rounds. If they fail four times: no more limbs. If they fail five times they lose their head.

        Whether they live or die is entirely up to their own ability to use their own search engine, and that search engines ability to do what is fucking supposed to.

        Of course every one of them will end up headless. But that’s the point isn’t it?

    • heavy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for pointing that out, I’ve been trialing their service and so far I think it works well.