I suspect piracy will become increasingly popular in these countries

  • bioemerl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh I think they are making more revenue by charging the first world more, but I also think they shouldn’t be able to get away with it.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Making more revenue with negligible cost of distribution” and “we’re subsidizing poor countries” are not compatible.

      • bioemerl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah they are.

        The game is being sold to the third world only exist because the first world is paying as much money as they are.

        It’s literally a scheme to extract more money out of people. It should be illegal to prevent people from the ability to use things like VPNs to get those cheaper prices opening up the market and ensuring the prices actually match supply and demand.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, they are not.

          The fact that they’re making more net money from those regions than they otherwise would, by definition, makes it literally impossible for you to be subsidizing them. The alternative is not listing in those regions, not lowering prices for you. There is no theoretical world where you get a cheaper price in developed countries without regional pricing in lower income regions.

          • bioemerl@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The alternative is not listing in those regions, not lowering prices for you

            The alternative is marginally lower prices for the first world and higher prices for the third world as the prices become global instead of a massive grift which charges you based on how much money you’re able to spend.

            • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, there’s not even a theoretical possibility for that to happen. Lower priced regions are lower priced because there aren’t a meaningful number of people in those regions able to pay first world prices.

              Lowering the global revenue by whatever small amount those regions bring doesn’t somehow incentivize publishers to lower revenue further by lowering prices in the first world. It makes no sense to think it does.

              • bioemerl@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Forcing global prices will mean that the revenue maximizing price for the first world will do down.

                Publishers will not just ignore the global markets. They will just be forced to sell their games for actual value instead of “how much you can pay”

                • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  No, it won’t. There’s no point on the curve where low income regions have any possibility whatsoever of enough volume to affect it in any way. It’s not a matter of “affording” anything, because adjusting to satisfy those regions is lower revenue than ignoring them.

                  It won’t have a negligible impact on pricing. It will be literally zero.

                  • bioemerl@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Literally just open up a few games in steam DB. It’s a smooth gradient of nations with differing prices. It would absolutely not be negligible.