"The election of Donald Trump has sparked a surge of interest in the United States in South Korea’s 4B movement, a radical feminist crusade that preaches the four B’s: bi-hon (no marriage), bi-yeonae (no dating), bi-sekseu (no sex) and bi-chulsan (no childbirth),” the Los Angeles Times reports.

“Since Nov. 5, there have been more than 500,000 Google searches for ‘4b movement,’ while on TikTok, Instagram and X, support for the cause has been trending among young women voters who are vowing to swear off men.”

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s to protect against pregnancy in an environment where women’s rights have been eroded.

    If Project 2025 takes away abortion rights and even contraceptives, sex becomes a really big risk.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      The movement is to deny sex, not specifically to deny pregnancy. If it was about that, then sterile men and women would be excluded from this movement, but there is no mention of that at all. It’s just “swear off men, swear off sex”.

      • raynethackery@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        bi-chulsan (no childbirth)

        See, this is one of the FOUR Bs.

        Being pregnant is risky enough in an enlightened society where no healthcare is withheld. I’m not a woman but I don’t blame them for trying to protect themselves.

      • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        There’s what is stated and what is implied. In the absence of any sort of formal or “official” organization, participants get to choose their own level of involvement.

        I often refer to “birthstrike” as a conceptually similar and related group.

        • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well they should consider making the implication clearer, because I honestly feel that the way it is stated will do more harm than good. If it is a birth strike aimed at abortion risks, then call it that.

          I have supported women’s rights in every way I know how in my lifetime, but I can’t go along with this movement as it is currently stated—to me that suggests that they need to refine the messaging a little, or explain the desired outcome more clearly.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Indeed, it seems this messaging may end up with the same energy as “defund the police” did…an albatross to put around the necks of the majority of people in this country (even if they don’t always vote. FFS.).

            Also, the chuds are just going to call all the liberal men dating liberal women “cucks” even more at this point…this will feed right into their enjoyment and they are going to bask in it.